@triducshop.2: mình i về nháa.

Benn
Benn
Open In TikTok:
Region: VN
Sunday 25 October 2026 14:28:11 GMT
739930
91249
412
6676

Music

Download

Comments

o.be12e
Cà phê sữa :
Tính hk cmt đâu mà thấy mấy đứa nó nói chuyện hài lắm,mấy cặp đôi khác yêu nhau đi chơi với nhau thậm chí là họ đã ngủ với nhau luôn,họ đi chơi đi biển đi ăn up lên Hk sao hết đến lượt con bé này lại bị toxic không hiểu luôn😌
2026-10-25 15:17:32
1194
triducshop.2
Benn :
huhu
2026-10-25 14:37:06
1850
heokutoe
Ngoc Thuy :
giữ mình là k đc đi chơi chung hả mấy cha mấy mẹ :)
2026-10-26 01:47:34
103
usery65z3c6fuf
🎀Thanh Ngân🎀 :
Ủa mất gì mà bl cái câu giữ mình hoài dị , ta yêu nhau ta làm gì kệ ta 🤔
2026-10-25 15:44:39
74
cyim.00
Thiên Trangg :
cà phê sữa hả ben
2026-10-25 15:27:18
100
ellanguyen.68
𝐄𝐥𝐥𝐚 𝐍𝐠𝐮𝐲𝐞𝐧 🇺🇸 :
Hp nhoéee 2 đứa 🥰
2026-10-25 15:33:38
23
dim.anh.ks
menmen:) :
ủa ngủ chung phòng hả (kobt nên hỏi ([Thích]
2026-10-25 22:27:18
5
taolamemayne_03
píe bii :
v là kco cái live nào hả..
2026-10-25 14:32:52
61
bunbone1704
Búnn Pòo :
up hình đi t mắc coiii haii bây lắm rồi á
2026-10-25 14:43:37
70
th.khoi206
Hoàng Khôiii :
chúc 2 bạn hạnh phúc trong câu chuyện của mình và lun lun có những điều tốt đẹp với hai bạn nhá
2026-10-25 15:21:52
38
nqhn.0_0
ꪔ̤̮ :
v là k có cái live nào =)))) thui về sg rồi live nữa nha 2 đứaaa
2026-10-25 14:31:58
427
yenlinh.270902
Yến Linh 🎀 :
Ảnh nói “ chỉ cần ẻm nói nhớ tui thì tui sẽ xuống “ mà ảnh nhớ chịu hỏng nổi nên ảnh xuống lun kkk
2026-10-25 14:53:46
159
chunn_onlygdinhca
𝐂𝐡𝐮𝐧❤️‍🔥 :
Ổng bả dthuong kìa chèn
2026-10-25 15:09:54
12
nhanma722
Nhân Mã🍃 :
đã quá ben ưi
2026-10-25 15:22:46
6
nmp_07087
Ng Mai Phuong :
ông bt tui phái ông bà lắm ko yêu cầu up nhiều ảnh lênnnnn
2026-10-25 15:20:42
5
mebeer2023
Kiều tiên :
Nhiều ng trong cmt ak có khi 16 17t đã có con rồi lun ak . Nên là ai lm được gì lm ko ảnh hưởng ai . Mất cái gì mà cứ to6 nhau chi.
2026-10-26 01:38:15
5
lnhi001
Nhi💋 :
hoy đứa gánn làm đứa gánn học có thời gian lại gặp tiếp. đừng buồn những chn to6. lấy đó làm động lực di lên nữa. cố gắng cùng nhau đi lên kím ra tiền và vì nhau mà ở lại nhéeee
2026-10-25 15:45:08
17
kim.giu3811
uk!! :
" đừng yêu giống thiên thơ và tuấn kiệt, hãy yêu giống thiên thơ và trí đức "
2026-10-26 05:52:38
1
ebe.thoooo
thí :
Em giữ mình lắm mấy chị ơi
2026-10-25 14:41:02
55
thoconngocnhung0
🐝Thơ con~~ngoc nhungg🐝 :
à ai trg bl này to6 ảnh chỉ á thì e nói ln nha, k nuôi đc ngày nào thì đừng nói ngt này nọ ạ, k cho tiền thì đừng phán xét ạ
2026-10-26 00:22:43
5
bunxinhday
kt🐝 :
cưng dạ🤭
2026-10-25 14:31:36
20
trandinhlinhhuong
Trần đinh linh hương :
2em cứ hạnh phúc và vui vẻ như vậy nha đừng quan tâm những lời của ng ko có đc hạnh phúc những ng như vậy hay nghen tị lắm đừng quan tâm chi❤️
2026-10-25 15:20:09
9
ngthiainhi2004
Thuỷ Trúc :
cutee
2026-10-25 14:30:04
10
_meoo.287
meoo~ :
đẹp đôi
2026-10-25 14:29:59
19
hanbanhbao04
buxiiz :
dthhhhh
2026-10-25 14:50:53
10
To see more videos from user @triducshop.2, please go to the Tikwm homepage.

Other Videos

Why is it that when we can't understand a book, we assume the problem is with us? Why do we treat hard-to-read as being must-be-clever? Well, in 1999, the philosopher Martha Nussbaum answered these questions as part of a major takedown against Judith Butler. Nussbaum argued that philosophy is a discourse of equals, where we swap arguments out in the open. It's a clean fight where blows and tactics are visible. And Nussbaum argues that there are two problems with anybody who tries to use confusing language as a kind of sophistry. The first problem is that obscurity creates an aura of importance, and it bullies the reader into assuming that if they can't follow something, something deep must be going on, and they, the reader, need to work to find it. But when a writer rattles off a lot of names alongside mountains of jargon, while offering few explanations or real-life examples, they are trying to hammer the reader into docility: it's your fault for not understanding. The second problem is that inaccessible, complicated and needlessly convoluted language isn't a debate between equals. Because if you can't pin down what somebody is trying to say, you cannot challenge them or test their claims. Butler's defence was to say that ordinary, clear language is polluted by the restraints of the world as it already is. If we are to be original or break the traditions holding us back, we need to break even with the language that people commonly use. So are you Team Nussbaum or Butler? Do you think that needlessly complicated language is a kind of bullying? Or do you think we need to go beyond the narrow mainstream parameters of everyday language?
Why is it that when we can't understand a book, we assume the problem is with us? Why do we treat hard-to-read as being must-be-clever? Well, in 1999, the philosopher Martha Nussbaum answered these questions as part of a major takedown against Judith Butler. Nussbaum argued that philosophy is a discourse of equals, where we swap arguments out in the open. It's a clean fight where blows and tactics are visible. And Nussbaum argues that there are two problems with anybody who tries to use confusing language as a kind of sophistry. The first problem is that obscurity creates an aura of importance, and it bullies the reader into assuming that if they can't follow something, something deep must be going on, and they, the reader, need to work to find it. But when a writer rattles off a lot of names alongside mountains of jargon, while offering few explanations or real-life examples, they are trying to hammer the reader into docility: it's your fault for not understanding. The second problem is that inaccessible, complicated and needlessly convoluted language isn't a debate between equals. Because if you can't pin down what somebody is trying to say, you cannot challenge them or test their claims. Butler's defence was to say that ordinary, clear language is polluted by the restraints of the world as it already is. If we are to be original or break the traditions holding us back, we need to break even with the language that people commonly use. So are you Team Nussbaum or Butler? Do you think that needlessly complicated language is a kind of bullying? Or do you think we need to go beyond the narrow mainstream parameters of everyday language?

About